Website cost calculator · 2026 survey data

What a website actually costs

Two 2026 surveys asked the same question and came back five times apart. Rather than average them into a number neither of them supports, this shows you both — who said it, how many people they asked, and where you sit between them.

No email required, because there is nowhere to put one: the reading updates as you answer, and you can copy a link to your exact result. Three questions, because three is all the survey data can honestly answer.

What you're building

Pages that explain what you do and get people to call you. No login, no catalogue.

Roughly how big

A typical local service business.

After launch

Updates, backups, security patches, small fixes.

To build it

Two 2026 surveys' published cost ranges for the selected project, drawn to scale on a shared axis.
Agencies worldwide quote$1,000$3,000

GoodFirms 2026 · Basic website / MVP — 59.9% of firms · 300+ web development firms across 31 countries, surveyed April–May 2026

US buyers report paying$6,500$15,000

WebFX 2026 · Basic small-business website · 250 US-based marketing professionals, 2026 pricing

These two surveys are 5.4× apart on the same question. That gap is real, and it is why every number you have found online contradicts the last one.

To keep it running

Published monthly ongoing-cost ranges from the same two surveys.
Agencies worldwide quote$500$3,000/mo

GoodFirms 2026 · Monthly retainer — ~58% of the market · 300+ web development firms across 31 countries, surveyed April–May 2026

US buyers report paying$42$417/mo

WebFX 2026 · $501–$5,000 per year, converted to monthly · 250 US-based marketing professionals, 2026 pricing

Read this gap more carefully than the one above: these two are not measuring quite the same thing. GoodFirms is reporting what agencies charge on a retainer, while the WebFX figure is an annual total across all businesses — including the ones running a site themselves on a $20 builder. The truth for a maintained business site sits nearer the upper band than the lower.

Why the two disagree

The sell side

GoodFirms 2026

300+ web development firms across 31 countries, surveyed April–May 2026

Global and sell-side. The same survey puts developers in India, Pakistan and Vietnam at $10–$15/hr against $50–$100/hr in the US, so its worldwide averages sit well below what a US buyer is quoted.

The buy side

WebFX 2026

250 US-based marketing professionals, 2026 pricing

US-only and buy-side — what people report actually paying, which includes the revisions, content and scope creep a quote never mentions. It is also published by a large US agency whose own engagements start at $8,000/month.

Neither survey is wrong. One is asking sellers across 31 countries what they quote; the other is asking US buyers what they paid. A quote is the beginning of a project and a payment is the end of one, and the distance between those two things is most of what this page is about.

Geography does the rest. GoodFirms' own hourly-rate table puts developers in India, Pakistan and Vietnam at $10–$15 an hour against $50–$100 in the United States — a spread wide enough that a “global average” price tells a US buyer almost nothing. When an article quotes one confident number for what a website costs, it has quietly picked a side of both splits without telling you which.

How agencies actually price the work

A web design quote is not one number so much as six stacked on top of each other. Asked how a project budget breaks down, the GoodFirms panel converged on roughly the same shape: discovery and planning take 5–10% of the budget, design 10–20%, front-end development 20–30%, back-end development 30–40%, testing and QA 10–20%, and project management 5–10%. That split is worth keeping when you compare quotes — a bid that looks cheap is usually missing one of those lines, not performing it for free.

The same survey found the market heavily concentrated at the small end: 63% of agencies quote fixed prices between $1,000 and $15,000, which is why most of the numbers you meet first sit in that band. And it carries a warning about all of them — GoodFirms estimates the real cost of a professionally built website runs 100–200% higher than the build quote once hosting, maintenance, integrations and post-launch updates are counted. The build price is the down payment; the second chart above is the mortgage.

What moves your number

Within either band, where a real quote lands is mostly decided by a handful of levers — the same ones the surveys identify when they ask why projects run over budget.

What pushes it up

  • Custom design rather than a theme — GoodFirms puts design at 10–20% of a build.
  • Integrations with software you already run: booking, POS, CRM, inventory.
  • Content you need written. WebFX puts copywriting at $60–$300 a page.
  • Compliance work. Healthcare and finance sit a full tier above other verticals.

What brings it down

  • Copy and photographs ready before design starts.
  • Fewer, better pages. Page count is the clearest cost lever there is.
  • A theme or template where it will not be seen.
  • Launching a core site first and adding the rest once it is earning.

One lever is new since these surveys began: AI. GoodFirms notes that simple websites which cost $5,000 three years ago are now being built for under $1,500, with a third of firms pricing AI-builder sites at $500–$1,500 and nearly a quarter below $500. The same survey is blunt about the limit — enterprise builds are not cheaper. AI compressed the price of simple; it has not touched the price of complicated.

The numbers we refused to use

A page like this is only as honest as its worst citation, so here is what got cut. The most-quoted statistic in this space — that 61% of small businesses spent under $10,000, usually attributed to a Clutch survey — could not be traced to any primary Clutch page: the resource URL is dead and the press release carries no cost figures. It does not appear here. The dozens of agency blog posts publishing “average website cost” tables all cite each other in a circle, with no methodology at the bottom of it. None of them appear here either.

We also tried to add US government wage data as an anchor and could not verify it at the source, so it stays out. What remains is two surveys with named methodologies — one sell-side and global, one buy-side and US-only — linked where they are used, with sample sizes shown. When they disagree, the page says so instead of splitting the difference.

Website cost questions, answered from the data

How much does a website cost in 2026?

It depends on who you ask, and the two best available surveys disagree. GoodFirms, which surveyed 300+ web development firms across 31 countries in 2026, found most agencies quote $1,000–$3,000 for a basic website, $5,000–$20,000 for a mid-sized one, and $20,000–$50,000 for enterprise builds and custom web applications. WebFX, which surveyed 250 US-based marketing professionals, found US buyers report paying $6,500–$15,000 for a basic small-business site, $15,000–$50,000 for a mid-sized one, and $50,000–$100,000 at the enterprise level. The honest answer is a range keyed to what you are building — and to which side of the market you ask.

Why is every website cost estimate I find different?

Two reasons: geography and side of market. Global surveys mix regions where developers charge $10–$15 an hour with the US, where the same survey puts rates at $50–$100 an hour, so worldwide averages sit well below what a US buyer is quoted. And a quote is not a payment: sell-side surveys record what agencies say a project costs at the start, while buy-side surveys record what buyers actually spent by the end, including revisions, content and scope changes. Any single number you find online has quietly picked one side of both of those splits.

How much does website maintenance cost per month?

GoodFirms 2026 reports monthly retainers of $500–$3,000 for nearly 58% of the market. WebFX 2026 reports most businesses spending $501–$5,000 per year — but that figure covers all businesses, including those running a site themselves on a DIY builder, which is why it reads so much lower. For a professionally maintained business site, the retainer band is the more honest guide.

Are AI website builders really cheaper?

For simple sites, yes — and the effect is measured, not hypothetical. In the GoodFirms 2026 survey, 33.5% of firms price AI-builder websites at $500–$1,500 and another 23.7% below $500, and the survey notes that simple websites which cost $5,000 three years ago are now being built for under $1,500. The same survey is equally clear that enterprise builds are not getting cheaper: the savings live where the work is simple, and disappear where it is not.

Does this calculator show AIWebHub's prices?

No. Every figure on this page is a published range from a named third-party survey, cited where it appears. AIWebHub does not publish prices, because we do not sell fixed packages — every project is scoped individually and quoted with a clear breakdown. If you want a number for your project rather than the market, request a quote and we will send one.

Do I need to enter my email to see my result?

No. There is no submit button and no gate — the reading updates the moment you change an answer, and you can copy a link to your exact result and send it to anyone. Most website cost calculators make you trade an email address for a number they invented. This one shows you what the surveys actually say, for free, because the useful conversation starts after the number, not before it.

Want one number instead of two ranges?

That is the honest limit of survey data: it can tell you what the market charges, but not what your project costs. For that, someone has to look at what you actually need. Tell us what you are building and we will send a fixed quote — no call required, and nothing on this page changes based on whether you do.

Request a quote

Figures on this page are published survey ranges from GoodFirms 2026 and WebFX 2026, not AIWebHub prices. AIWebHub quotes every project individually.